DemLabs blog

Flawed right wing abortion pill study retracted: Follow the money, conflicts and justices

"Studies cited in case over abortion pill are retracted due to flaws and conflicts of interest"

Sage Perspectives, a medical journal has retracted two studies claiming to show the harms of the abortion pill mifepristone, citing conflicts of interest by the authors and flaws in their research.

Two of the three studies retracted by medical publisher Sage Perspectives were cited in a pivotal Texas court ruling that has threatened access to the pill. The U.S. Supreme Court will take up the case next month, with a decision expected later this year. The court's ruling could impact nationwide access to mifepristone, including whether it continues to be available by mail. Medication abortion accounts for more than half of all abortions in the U.S., and typically involves two drugs: mifepristone and misoprostol. - ABC News

Who wrote these retracted studies? Who funds the groups they work for? Who appointed the judges involved with threatening access to abortion pills? Connect the dots for yourself with this relationship map. Click on any person for details which will appear in the side panel. Click on the line connecting individuals to see the relationship between them.

Follow the money, justices and conflicts of interests in the retracted abortion pill study.

Conflict of interest

Sage also looked into the concern that the authors had conflicts of interest—finding that they did. All but one of the study's authors were linked to one or more anti-abortion advocacy organization, despite that they all had declared no conflicts of interest when they submitted the article for publication or in the article itself, Sage noted.

Moreover, one of the peer-reviewers—tasked with reviewing the study manuscript and deciding if it was worthy of publication—was also associated with the Charlotte Lozier Institute at the time of the review. Sage determined that the peer review process was compromised and noted that the same reviewer also reviewed two other studies led by Studnicki—the two other studies Sage retracted, one published in 2022 and the other in 2019. - Ars Technica

Trump packs courts with right wing extremist justices

Contraceptive deserts

With barriers to reproductive healthcare increasingespecially for Black, Latino and poor people—and more than 19 million women in the U.S. living in “contraceptive deserts” without easy access to reproductive health clinics, Opill will be a vital tool in the fight for reproductive justice.

Dark money anti-abortion and pay-to-play groups are predictably responding to the FDA’s over-the-counter birth control pill decision with disinformation—deriding this basic action by the federal government to protect the right to prevent unwanted pregnancy. - MS

Follow the dark money

Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), a 501(c)(3) non-profit, purports to not take a position on abortion. Along with its 501(c)(4) arm called Independent Women’s Voice (IWV), IWF has collectively received more than $6.5 million from groups tied to Leonard Leo, the anti-abortion lawyer who created Trump’s shortlist of nominees for the Supreme Court. These nominees were expressly chosen to overturn Roe v. Wade—and IWF and IWV backed them. - MS

Vote to protect your freedoms and right to an abortion from billionaires stacking the courts

TakeAway: Elections have consequences. You get right wing, extremist justices keen to strip women of their freedoms. Vote for President Biden and Democrats to protect your freedom to choose and control your body.

DISCLAIMER: ALTHOUGH THE DATA FOUND IN THIS BLOG AND INFOGRAPHIC HAS BEEN PRODUCED AND PROCESSED FROM SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE, NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED CAN BE MADE REGARDING THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, LEGALITY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION. THIS DISCLAIMER APPLIES TO ANY USES OF THE INFORMATION WHETHER ISOLATED OR AGGREGATE USES THEREOF.

Share this Newsletter:

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

DemLabs applies innovative technology and storytelling tools in service of democratic values. It lowers the barrier of funding for worthy candidates and non-profits by applying existing free/affordable solutions.